Changeset 11046 for dotorg/trunk/html/beps/bep_0001.html
- Timestamp:
- 04/29/08 18:00:36 (23 months ago)
- Files:
-
- 1 modified
-
dotorg/trunk/html/beps/bep_0001.html (modified) (2 diffs)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
-
dotorg/trunk/html/beps/bep_0001.html
r11042 r11046 39 39 <tr class="field"><th class="field-name">Title:</th><td class="field-body">The BitTorrent Enhancement Proposal Process</td> 40 40 </tr> 41 <tr class="field"><th class="field-name">Version:</th><td class="field-body">110 36</td>42 </tr> 43 <tr class="field"><th class="field-name">Last-Modified:</th><td class="field-body"><a class="reference external" href="http://bittorrent.org/trac/browser/dotorg/trunk/html/beps/bep_0001.rst">2008-0 2-29 16:55:28 -0800 (Fri, 29 Feb2008)</a></td>41 <tr class="field"><th class="field-name">Version:</th><td class="field-body">11045</td> 42 </tr> 43 <tr class="field"><th class="field-name">Last-Modified:</th><td class="field-body"><a class="reference external" href="http://bittorrent.org/trac/browser/dotorg/trunk/html/beps/bep_0001.rst">2008-04-29 18:00:27 -0700 (Tue, 29 Apr 2008)</a></td> 44 44 </tr> 45 45 <tr class="field"><th class="field-name">Author:</th><td class="field-body">David Harrison <dave at bittorrent.com></td> … … 154 154 <p>BEP champions are responsible for collecting community feedback on a 155 155 BEP before submitting it for review. A BEP that has not been discussed 156 on <a class="reference external" href="mailto:bittorrent-list%40bittorrent.org">bittorrent-list<span>@</span>bittorrent<span>.</span>org</a> will not be accepted. However, wherever 157 possible, long open-ended discussions in the BEP forum should 158 be avoided. Strategies to keep the discussions efficient include: 159 setting up a separate SIG forum for the topic, having the BEP 160 author accept private comments in the early design phases, setting up 161 a wiki page, etc. BEP authors should use their discretion here.</p> 156 in the BEPs forum on forum.bittorrent.org will not be 157 accepted. However, wherever possible, long open-ended discussions in 158 the BEP forum should be avoided. Strategies to keep the discussions 159 efficient include: setting up a separate SIG forum for the topic, 160 having the BEP author accept private comments in the early design 161 phases, setting up a wiki page, etc. BEP authors should use their 162 discretion here.</p> 162 163 <p>Once the authors have completed a BEP, they must inform the BEP editor 163 164 that it is ready for review. BEPs are reviewed by the BDFL and his